The New Face of the Social Conservative Revolution!
Posted by J.P. Freire October 23 at 9:35 AM | Permalink | Comments (1)
One major theme of the Values Voter Summit last weekend was how Liberal Hollywood has destroyed our values. In general, there was a lot of martyrdom on stage -- from Giuliani's persecution at the hands of editorials from The New York Times down to the actors/directors/etc. working in the filthy, filthy water of the Left Coast. You can slake that stuff on at red meat conferences because people eat it up like liberals eat up jokes at the expense of George W. Bush. It's shtick.
It can also be an excellent sales pitch. As Andy pointed out, Giuliani did receive praise from The New York Times, though it wasn't because he did stuff that was liberal. But Rudy's not going to say that because it undermines his conservative credentials. And as Julian Sanchez notes, the inability of religiously themed films to find major distribution in the U.S. isn't because of liberal Hollywood's agenda to make the kids gay, but why not pretend? That way, people will feel obligated to see the movie, if only to stick it to all those lib-rawls:
"Major Hollywood distribution companies" never pick up little thoughtful foreign films like Bella. Independent distributors like Lion's Gate or quasi-autonomous niche distributors affiliated with one of the bigger companies do, as you can easily confirm by looking at the last dozen winners of that Toronto Film Festival People's Choice Award. An award, incidentally, which is suggestive of box office potential, but hardly dispositive: There are plenty of hits (Life Is Beautiful, Whale Rider, Hotel Rwanda, Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon, American Beauty), but also a fair number of misses: Tsotsi grossed just under $3 million in the U.S.; Zatôichi less than $900,000; The Hanging Garden, under a million. Even the successful ones, though, aren't getting distributed by Paramount.
An entire panel at the summit, composed of members of the cast/production team behind the film Bella, nodded in agreement with each other about how the elites in the movie industry were against the themes in this film. The movie seems like it'll be great and I'd like to see it, but just as Giuliani's goal is simply to sell himself on the basis of how much liberals hate him, the panel was selling a movie based on how much of a threat it was to liberals. That might work, too. But it's misguided to believe the claim that businesses are passing up the opportunity to make lots of money on a movie just because it has a moral message. If anything, the elites are probably learning the lesson of the Passion of the Christ, that there's a lot of money to be made from moviegoing Christians.
Anyway, the other thing I wanted to mention was that the lead actor in Bella was treated like a superstar. Apparently all he's accomplished in his life was "living in sin" (as he tells it, but I'm dying to know exactly how he went about it), but then finding his faith in Jesus Christ. Conversion stories are generally compelling, but hardly grounds for an auditorium full of applause. The crowd felt differently though: After all, he's good looking and has a thick eh-spanish accent (as my Spanish father would say).
You be the judge:

"Is it Holy in here? Or is it just me?
|